David Remnick: The relationship between Fox News and Donald Trump is not just close, it can be profoundly influential. Trump frequently responds to segments in real time online, even if only to complain about a poll that he doesn't like. He's tapped the network for nearly two dozen roles within his administration, including the current Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, who is a former weekend host. The network is seen as having an outsized impact on his relationship with his base and even his agenda. Most recently, it's been reported that Fox News coverage of the Iran-Israel conflict influenced Trump's decision to enter that fight.

Female Voice: America First is not sitting in a beach chair and using words. It's taking decisive action when we can take out Fordow the one swoop of an airplane.

David: While the network's right-wing commentators, from Sean Hannity to Laura Ingraham to Mark Levin, tend to grab the most headlines and stand as the ideological coloring of the network, special report, its 6:00 PM broadcast that's anchored by Bret Baier, is essential to the conservative media complex. Bret Baier draws over 3 million viewers a night, at times surpassing legacy brands like CBS Evening News, despite being available in half as many homes. Now, Baier insists on his impartiality, but his network's reputation as an outlet for the right and its connection to President Trump himself can sometimes make his job, well, a source of real fascination. We spoke last week. Bret, welcome to the belly of the beast.

Bret Baier: Thank you, thank you. Good to be here. Who knew?

[laughter]

David: Who knew, right? The New Yorker and Fox. Tell me a little bit about that. I want to get a sense of, when you're at Fox, you think about what's now called the lamestream media, the New York Times, and the New Yorkers of the world because God knows we're being perfectly honest with each other on my side of the street, if that's what it is, there's a lot of talk about Fox.

Bret: Sure.

David: In the interest of coming to understand each other a little bit better, I wanted to have this conversation because I really respect the interviews you do, and I think it's probably a complicated role that you play at Fox. I want to talk about that as well. As it said, we all live in our silos now. It's very, very different than it might have been 25, 30 years ago. How do you view it?

Bret: First of all, it's good to be here. Thanks for having me. I don't view it adversarial in any way. I've worked with all kinds of folks in every different media outlet. I have a lot of friends in the so-called mainstream media. I like to think of my as doing a lot of the same stories, maybe in different ways sometimes, but trying to keep it fair in my view. I've been at Fox for 27 years. The Atlanta bureau started in my apartment with a fax machine and a cell phone. I went from covering the Southeast and South America to covering the Pentagon to covering the White House. Then I took over from my mentor and friend, Brit Hume, 16 years ago now, in January of 2009. I've been anchor and executive editor of Special Report, and really my focus is horse blinders on that hour and trying to create an hour of news and analysis that somebody could watch no matter where their political leanings are, and come to the end of the hour and say, "That was fair. I know what's going on in the US and around the world." I don't have any animosity, I really don't towards anybody else.

David: Why did you get into the business? Why did you become a journalist?

Bret: I was a ham in high school. I was the sports editor of the paper. I'd interned at a local station in Atlanta, WSB, with a sports guy, Ernie Johnson Jr, actually, who went on to NBA fame and his coverage. I looked over at the news people and said, "Wow, I like that over there."

David: Was politics on your mind as such?

Bret: No, it really wasn't.

David: Did you grow up in a political environment or not?

Bret: No, not really. I mean, paid attention to it, but it wasn't really a driving force until I became a general assignment reporter for a little station in Hilton Head, South Carolina, Rockford, Illinois, Raleigh, North Carolina. Then I started with Fox when Fox started. I really became interested in politics, really to try to file stories to get on Brit Hume's show, Special Reports, so I would bounce around the Southeast and do political stories to try to get on that show.

David: The beginning you're describing is the story of God knows how many other journalists and TV journalists as well. Are you saying that you could just as easily have ended up and been comfortable at CBS News or NBC News?

Bret: Sure. I worked for a NBC affiliate, an ABC affiliate, a CBS affiliate. My trajectory was I got a call from an agent at the time who said, "This place, Fox News, would like to hire you." I said, "They want to go for an interview." He said, "No, they want you to be the Atlanta guy." That's how it started.

David: Would you say that you have politics? Some journalists deny that they do, or they tamp them down and maybe put them in a jar over by the door.

Bret: I'd like to think that people don't know what my politics are. Of course, I'm not a robot. I have feelings and thoughts about it.

David: Tell me about that.

Bret: I really do think in my job that that's not my role to get emotionally behind some issue.

David: I'm not saying that it is, but when you go to the voting booth, do you generally pull the lever for blue or red?

Bret: I don't vote.

David: You don't vote. This is like my old editor at the Washington Post, Len Downie, he said he didn't vote. You don't do it as a matter of professional hygiene.

Bret: Yes. It's weird. I just don't.

David: You think it would put you in a spot?

Bret: I would answer your question, and I'd answer it, legitimately, I would tell you, but I don't. I don't have to answer that question.

David: It's a matter of comfort.

Bret: Yes, it's a matter of comfort. Listen, I'm listed as an independent, and I like to think that I can think both ways, but of course, I have feelings about certain things, and when I'm talking to friends, I express that.

David: What about when you're talking publicly?

Bret: When I'm talking publicly, I'm really thinking about all sides watching my show, that I'm not advocating. I'm not emotional. I'm trying to preside over this hour and give you a sense of what this side says, what that side says. You make the decision. It sounds cliche that we report, you decide, but I truly believe that my job is to lay it out there and let the viewers decide how they think about it.

David: What is the job of an interviewer? When you go in and you've-- you've interviewed Trump as many times as anybody I can imagine, certainly on television. What are you aiming to figure out? What are you aiming to do?

Bret: Ideally, I'm aiming to take them off their talking points, not hear the recited thing that we've heard X number of times. I was friends with Tim Russert, the late Tim Russert, and we'd fly back and forth to New York here, and I would sit next to him and say, "Tim, I really love your style. What do you think the secret is?" He said, "Bret, it's never about the questions, it's always about listening to the answer." I always took that to heart because it's always the redirect, listening to the answer, figuring out what the nugget is that's new, and then redirecting. That's what I'm trying to do, no matter what the ideological side is.

David: Is there a particular requirement for interviewing Trump?

Bret: Get in on the breath.

[laughter]

David: No. His strategy is to overwhelm?

Bret: A lot of times, but if you get in the cadence with him and you ask the question and then you follow up, he does, to his credit, answer the question eventually. Sometimes he weaves, as he says, but he gives you an answer, as opposed to some politicians who never give you an answer.

David: Trump comes into the room, president comes into the room, sits across from you, and it's a highly artificial environment. There's lights all around, there are cameras. There's an element of occasion. What's the immediate goal in the first question?

Bret: Depends on the interview.

David: Because he's going to overwhelm you, isn't he?

Bret: Of course. I mean, he's going to try to filibuster or talk about what he wants to talk about, but I'm trying to get to the heart of whatever the news is at the day. It also depends on the interview. My last interview I had with him was ahead of the Super Bowl. It's a different interview at the Super Bowl interview, as opposed to the previous interview I did with him as a candidate, where we were in the middle of these legal cases, and I was pressing on very pointed things.

David: He didn't like it. We're talking about, if I remember correctly, Bret, the thing that really annoyed him is when you pressed him about the keeping of papers. That case.

Bret: Yes.

David: Let's put it not too fine a point on. He was really pissed.

Bret: Yes. He called it a nasty interview afterwards.

Donald Trump: First of all, I won in 2020 by a lot. Okay? Let's get that straight. I won in 2020.

Bret: You know that's not what [unintelligible 00:10:03].

Donald Trump: If you look at all of the tapes, if you look at everything that you want to look at, you take a look at Truth to Vote, where they have people stuffing the ballot boxes on tapes, or let's go to recent--

Bret: Mr. President, [unintelligible 00:10:12].

Donald Trump: Wait a minute, let's go to recent FBI Twitter. Let's go to recent the 51 agents, all corrupt stuff, Bret.

Bret: Understand about the Hunter Biden [crosstalk].

Donald Trump: [crosstalk] but that's cheating on the election. That's cheating on the election.

Bret: You lost the 2020 election.

Donald Trump: Bret, you take a look at all of this stuff--

David: Is that because he expects something from Fox that he might not expect from, I don't know, CNN?

Bret: I don't know about that. I don't think so. In every time I've interviewed him, I think, taken it as a tough but fair effort. Over time, he's come to expect that. Now he's called me, "I tell you what, Bret, you're a five. Sometimes you're a four. You're nowhere near a seven." That's my best Trump.

David: That's pretty good, I have to say. I have to say, not bad at all.

[laughter]

What do you do when he lies?

Bret: Well, you fact-check as much as--

David: Can you do it in real time? That's not easy.

Bret: As much as you can. Like in that June 23 interview, which was really, at times, contentious, I tried to fact-check real time, but it's coming at you a lot of it. A lot of interviewers who have interviewed the President have that challenge. To do it real time, you've got to be on your game on a lot of different fronts. I think I did it fairly well in that interview and others, it's not as good, but to be able to get the access and ask the questions is a big deal.

David: I started life as a reporter at the Washington Post. The editor at that time was Benjamin Bradley, Ben Bradley. When he was a younger guy, when he was at Newsweek, he wasn't just a nodding acquaintance of John F. Kennedy. They were close, close friends. That was something he came to regret because not only did he come to realize that it was wrong, but I think he also felt that on any number of occasions, the president took advantage of that friendship. I'm not by any stretch of the imagination saying you are close friends with or even friends with Donald Trump, but you have played golf with him a number of times. Is there not some peril in that kind of relationship?

Bret: I think it's a great question. I answer it this way. Tell me the journalist that won't take the three hour off the record ability to pick the brain of the commander in chief, the president who's making these big decisions in an environment that is more relaxed, that perhaps he's more open to talking about different things to get you a sense of where his head is in the middle of all these big things. Tell me that journalist who doesn't take that, and I'll say, "I don't know who turns it down." I understand your question.

David: It doesn't run the risk of coziness, so that you start giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Bret: Now, I don't think it's bad to let him say his piece and to hear that side and press respectfully, but pointedly in a way that maybe he doesn't love the interview, which is the one-- I had still played golf with him right around the time that I did that interview.

David: Are you talking about politics on the golf course?

Bret: Sometimes. Sometimes it's golf, sometimes it's other things, but I'm getting a few questions that illuminate some aspect of my reporting that I tuck away off the record, and am able to better report on some things that he's doing.

David: Look, I wrote a book about Barack Obama. I know Barack Obama a bit, but I don't play golf with him.

Bret: Would you play golf with him?

David: It's a great question.

Bret: If he asked you, would you go out for three and a half hours with Barack Obama?

David: Well, it's not even golf. I've had any number of off-the-record conversations with him, and I find it deeply-- I'll be very honest, I find the whole off-the-record thing very frustrating.

Bret: Well, it's conflicting because you want to report what they say.

David: I'm not his friend.

Bret: Guess what? I've had many off-the-records with Barack Obama and with Joe Biden and with a lot of politicians who are on all sides.

David: Do you find any of those people distinctly different than they are on the record?

Bret: 100%.

David: All of them.

Bret: All of them.

David: Let's talk about Joe Biden for a second. To what extent did the media blow the story of his, to be unkind about it, really rapid aging, the process that we see all the time in life of slowly, slowly, and all at once. The all at once being the performance and the debate, where did we go wrong? Or when you look at me, are you saying why are you saying me? We got it right, and you got it wrong. Go ahead.

Bret: Oh, that mean you said it, I didn't. I think it was on my show a lot of times. Brit Hume mentioned it. In his analysis, Peter Doocy asked questions specifically about the mental cognitive ability and the critics who are saying he's losing a step. There were analysis pieces in various papers, media who cover media who said Fox was just doing this to make the president look bad. It was a giant conspiracy, and it was a Fox thing.

David: I can almost hear coming in through my headphones, people telling me, "Ask him. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. What about when Trump just goes off as he does, what he calls-- what is it called?

Bret: His weave.

David: The weave.

Bret: I know.

David: Is that a sign of mental discipline?

Bret: Well, listen, he obviously has a style I'm not going to analyze, but I don't think you could say that President Trump is in the same cognitive place as Joe Biden, and I think that was evident in that debate. More importantly, he's taken more questions in the first 30 days of his presidency than Joe Biden did in two years.

David: Totally true.

Bret: He's talked to every member of the press, no matter where they are, ABC, CBS, NBC. I'm not defending him. What I'm saying to you is that story, that cognitive story, was a big mess. A big mess.

[music]

David: Bret Baier is the anchor for FOX News Special Report. This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, and we'll continue our conversation in just a moment.

[music]

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick. Bret Baier has made a name for himself in the ideologically divided environment of cable news. He vehemently defends his position as nonpartisan, and at times, he's often had to square a version of the facts that his audience prefers with reality. We spoke this past week about how [unintelligible 00:17:21] keeps that position amid the attacks that can come from both sides of the political aisle and sometimes directly from President Trump himself. Our conversation continues now. In at least one interview that I recall, you said to President Trump, "You lost the 2020 election."

Bret: That was the interview that he thought was nasty.

David: He did not love that.

Bret: No.

David: Yet a lot of people on Fox not only said the opposite and continue to say the opposite, but they've kept that alive as a talking point. Are you comfortable with that?

Bret: I always point out that he lost the 2020 election. He can make the argument that it was stolen because of the coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop. Had the media covered the Hunter Biden laptop in that moment? Had Biden not said that 51 intelligence officers said it was Russian disinformation at that debate, could it have moved enough votes in each one of these states to make a difference? I can't make that call. I can't say that that's true or not true, but I do know that--

David: Isn't it an empirical fact as opposed to a matter of opinion? Some things are opinion, and some things are facts, so I think--

Bret: Well, the fact was that it was Hunter Biden's laptop. The fact was that the 51 intelligence agents--

David: A lot of factors influence the political weather.

Bret: Of course, well, that's what I'm getting to, is that I can't say that that's going to move the needle, but maybe that's the argument that he's making. It's not. He's saying it was more stolen, which is why I said it's not. What I'm saying to you is that the people who say that there were things that happened that were rigged, including the coverage of that, including this thing, they can make an argument as far as looking at the actual election with the votes that they found that didn't match up, or if there were shifts, there were never enough votes to overcome the lead in all of those states. We made that clear on my show and other shows.

David: Does President Trump call you on the phone a lot?

Bret: He calls me.

David: Do you call him?

Bret: I have called him, but it's more the other way.

David: First of all, reporters having the President of the United States' cell phone number seems to me without precedent.

Bret: 100% without precedent, but would you take it?

David: What does it tell you?

Bret: It tells you that he wants to be front and center in every story, and he is front and center in every story. What I take from it, off the record, is his perspective, his mindset.

David: It seems to me so strange that the same man that says the press is the enemy of the people is calling, I don't know, Maggie Haberman, Bret--

Bret: Jonathan Karl. Now, the Atlantic has the number.

David: Well, what am I, chopped liver?

Bret: Yes. Do you want it? I'll give it to you, David.

David: Please do. Let me write that down.

[laughter]

Bret: He would answer. I guarantee you, he would answer.

David: What is that about? His relationship to the press seems obsessive, contemptuous, legalistic. I don't mind telling you I'm on the end of a lawsuit on the Pulitzer board. It's an incomprehensible lawsuit.

Bret: Sure. It's the CBS thing, the-

David: ABC.

Bret: -ABC thing.

David: How do you analyze that?

Bret: I think it's a great question. I think it is part of the man. I think it is part of his time here in New York as a New York real estate mogul. The rough and tumble, to punch back and to characterize your opposition before they can characterize you. I think that's part of it. I think it is this cat-and-mouse game. For all of the things he says about the media, again, he's reaching out and doing interviews with the same people he says are nasty.

David: Not just nasty. You got the nice part of it.

Bret: Yes, sure.

David: It gets a lot worse.

Bret: Oh, yes. Well, you should see his supporters after that interview on my [unintelligible 00:21:48].

David: Tell me about that. What did you feel like?

Bret: Yes, it's a bombardment.

David: What were you called?

Bret: I was called everything. I was called everything.

David: Anything you can say, even on the podcast version of this conversation.

Bret: Just liberal--

David: Oh, that bad.

Bret: That bad.

David: Sorry, Bret.

Bret: Super crazy--

David: I guess person.

Bret: After your family, the whole thing.

David: Let me ask you this. All presidents come to in some way or another, resents the inquisitiveness and pursuit of the press, enemy of the people is something else. No?

Bret: I agree, and I wish you wouldn't use it. I've expressed that. I've expressed publicly--

David: On the golf course.

Bret: I have.

David: What does he say?

Bret: It's off the record, David.

David: On the record. He said to Lesley Stahl, "I do this because it causes disbelief in people, a certain relativism," the thing that the right used to argue about, by the way, cultural relativism and so on.

Bret: You have to admit. You have to admit that he touched a chord enough with people who liked, maybe didn't like everything he was doing, but liked what he was talking about, liked the policies he was talking about enough to get elected in the face of arguably an onslaught of coverage and attacks that came from one side. The first presidency was all about the Russia investigation. For almost six, seven months, that's all we heard about. It was nonstop.

David: I'm not going to accept the premise, but okay, go ahead.

Bret: It really was nonstop.

David: Well, you had all the intelligence agencies saying there was election interference. The question was whether or not the president played any role in that other than being the passive recipient.

Bret: Right. He was characterized as a Russian asset in some corners.

David: Although it was made confusing when the President of the United States gets up and says and addresses Russia, and says, "What-

Bret: Yes, I know.

David: "-bring it on."

Bret: Right, and the emails and finding the emails, we covered it all. My point is that that was a big part of the coverage of his first term. Then in this latest effort, all of these legal cases that were going after every element of-- now, you can argue whether it was right or wrong, but it was characterized as lawfare by the right, and people believed that. That it was over the top. In the face of all of that, he still touched enough people to get elected twice. When he first ran, nobody gave him a shot. We just came on the 10-year anniversary of that escalator ride down, and going back in the media clips saying, "Donald Trump will never be president, this is a joke, blah, blah, blah." Now he's been there twice. He's touching something in the country that some of the media missed.

David: I find you a very straightforward and fair interviewer 9 times out of 10. I confess to you that I thought when you interviewed Kamala Harris, and maybe you've heard this before, you were, and men can do this, were a little interruptee and maybe more more interrupting of her than of Donald Trump.

Bret: I've heard that criticism.

Kamala Harris: The first bill, practically within hours of taking the oath, was a bill to fix our immigration system.

Bret: Yes, ma'am. It was called the US Citizenship Act of 2021.

Kamala Harris: Exactly.

[crosstalk]

Bret: It was essentially a pathway to citizenship for the-- yes, ma'am.

Kamala Harris: May I please finish-- may I finish responding, please?

Bret: That's--

Kamala Harris: You have to let me finish, please.

Bret: You had the White House and the House and the Senate, and they didn't bring up that bill.

Kamala Harris: I'm in the middle of responding to the point you're raising, and I'd like to finish.

Bret: Yes, ma'am.

Bret: I think that if you look at that June 23 interview of Donald Trump, it was about equal as far as my push.

David: Not an interruption. Definitely, in terms of tough questions, I wouldn't argue with that.

Bret: I would look back. I did interrupt to try to redirect. I think the vice president wanted to come very combative to that interview and wanted that--

David: You wanted to push her back.

Bret: Well, I was actually ready to start with something very-- what's the most important issue for you, Madam Vice President? To be honest, we did a pre-tape. I'll give you the backstory quickly. We wanted to do it live at 6:00 PM, they wanted to do a pre-tape, which was fine with us. They said five o'clock, and we were ready at 4:30. She had an event. She was finished with that event and in the building by about 4:35. We just told the handlers, "We needed to start by 5:15. Otherwise, turning the tape around for the top of the six o'clock would be logistically tough for us to do." She's in the building. The event's over. I'm there. Lights are ready. We're all ready 4:35, 4:45, 4:50, 5:00, 5:05, 5:10, 5:13. Now, at 5:15, we have to do it live because we can't physically get the thing--

David: Like Bill O'Reilly.

Bret: "Do it live."

[laughter]

No, I wasn't going to do that. It wouldn't be caught on camera. 5:15, so my producers are pulling their hair out. They're sweating. Everybody's running around. 5:13:30. 5:14--

David: 5:13:30 [chuckles].

Bret: Yes, 5:14:30. The Vice President walks out of that room, sits down. I try to engage as you did before I came on in some conversation. "It was a great event outside. Madam Vice President, good to see you." She turned to me and said, "You ready?"

David: You didn't like that?

Bret: Well, I just thought it was icing the kicker. They were trying to create this pressure moment, and it changed the dynamic, and she was--

David: I was seeing the kicker for our non-football friends--

Bret: Oh, yes, yes [laughs].

David: Is to call a timeout right before a field goal attempt to make the kicker think about it extra hard.

Bret: Thank you.

David: You bet.

Bret: That's good.

David: Try to reach [unintelligible 00:28:18]

Bret: That's really good. That's really good. Anyway, it just started like that. I knew at that moment that she wanted to be combative. Listen, we gave a lot of time. She talked about issues she wanted to talk about, but also--

David: I think you're telling me she pissed you off a little bit by coming in 15 seconds [crosstalk]

Bret: I thought it was a little rude. Yes, I did. It doesn't emotionally affect me. As I sat there thinking, what is she trying to do by doing this? I think it was to create that dynamic. They admitted as much later, privately.

David: When you watch some of the opinion shows on your network, and I'm not making any inferences about your politics, but tell me this, do you ever want to throw a shoe at some of your colleagues or their flickering images on the screen?

Bret: Listen, they have a different job than I have. I think they do it very well. Their opinion. They come from an advocacy point of view or a perspective. They oftentimes stir the pot. We are under one umbrella. We're rowing in the same way, but we do something completely different.

David: Do you not feel implicated in some way by their excesses at times? By association.

Bret: People paint with a broad brush. The people who have a really, really big problem with Fox likely haven't watched Fox. I tell people, "Watch my show for three times. Drop me a post-"

David: Your show?

Bret: Yes. "-drop me a post and say, was this show fair?"

David: They're not just watching your show. They're going to watch Laura Ingraham. They're going to watch all of them. Sean Hannity, the whole--

Bret: Tell me the other opinion side of the cable news verse. Show me the news, show that's equal to Special Report on MSNBC.

David: Do you think Rachel Maddow is just the equivalent of Mark Levin or Laura Ingraham?

Bret: She obviously is an opinion person who advocates an opinion. I mean, you couldn't call--

David: What I'm saying is-

Bret: -you can't call it a new show.

David: -one more fact-based than the other. I think that's the crux of the matter.

Bret: It depends on your point of view, I suppose.

David: Facts don't depend on point of view.

Bret: Of course, but in the presentation of them. They're trying to get the water cooler to go one way or another.

David: Do you ever worry that you are the thing that they can point to and say, "But Bret Baier, fair-minded, straight up the middle, rigorous interviews. Whereas the gravy is coming from, the profits are coming from." Some of the biggest ratings they're getting is from people who are, let's just say, in another mode.

Bret: I would argue that if you build it, they will come-- Listen, I think the opinion folks do what they do. The Five is an amazing lead in for me. It gets the highest ratings exponentially. I look at those things where I'm beating network news across the country, in here in New York, NBC, ABC, CBS. That's a big shift for cable news to be able to say that. I think about the product and again focus on my product with horse blinders on.

David: Fair enough. What if you got an offer and they said, "Hi, I'm from NBC. Come to New York, we'll put you on MSNBC," or the executives at CNN called, "Come on, we'll give you an even better deal." Would you do that?

Bret: I'm really happy at Fox [clears throat].

David: I know you are.

Bret: I've been there 27 years.

David: Would it be something that you would rule out of hand for matters of loyalty or ideology?

Bret: No.

David: You'd be comfortable working at MSNBC doing what you do if all things were the same?

Bret: If MSNBC had a news show that they would develop and leave the executive editor to make the news decisions about the coverage in that hour. I have a lot of autonomy in this position, and Fox has been tremendous and has supported the news division so much.

David: I'm not trying to be tricky here. This is an honest question. If you could do that at a network that's overall politics were different, you'd be fine doing that?

Bret: Yes, but I'm not thinking about that. I have a really great position right now, and I feel like we are driving a lot of news, not just for Fox viewers but for every viewer. We get picked up in papers in the New York Times and Washington Post, and we are making news. We have reporters, breaking news. They're empowering us to do that. Listen, again, I'm very happy, but to your question, if there's a news product, I think there should be more news shows, not fewer. I'm sad that there aren't more news shows like Special Report on other channels. I'm happy in one business sense, because I think people look to that to try to get a straight shot, but they can't really find it a lot of places.

[music]

David: Bret Baier, thank you so much.

Bret: Thanks. It's been a pleasure.

David: Bret Baier, he's been at FOX News for nearly three decades, and he anchors the network's Special Report five nights.

[music]

 

Copyright © 2025 New York Public Radio. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use at www.wnyc.org for further information.

New York Public Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline, often by contractors. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of New York Public Radio’s programming is the audio record.