Micah Loewinger: Hey, you're listening to the On the Media Midweek Podcast. I'm Micah Loewinger. This week, The Atlantic's Shane Harris had some breaking news. It turns out that the rank-and-file employees at the CIA are increasingly concerned that the objectivity of the agency is being undermined by political influence. The story cites an annual survey in which respondents pointed specifically to the actions of former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

During her time in office, Gabbard fired two career officers who found that Venezuela was not directing the criminal gang Tren de Aragua. She also revoked the security clearances of dozens of national security officers, some of whom had worked on the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Then at the end of June, Tulsi Gabbard resigned.

As Director of National Intelligence, Gabbard presided over the nation's top intelligence agencies, including the CIA, the NSA, and the intelligence branch of the FBI. Her tenure was brief but embattled. In addition to advising the president on things like Iran's nuclear capabilities, Gabbard regularly released tranches of declassified documents in reports with headlines like "New Evidence Uncovers Obama-Directed Creation of False Intelligence Report Used to Launch Years-Long Coup to Undermine President Trump and the American People."

Tulsi Gabbard: On my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I'm releasing never-before-seen communications and documents that expose exactly how Fauci worked with politicized career leadership in the intelligence community to suppress the truth about his actions, the virus's lab leak origins, and his role in directing US funding for this dangerous research that caused immeasurable harm and countless lost lives.

Micah Loewinger: The journalist Denby Fawcett, who has covered Tulsi Gabbard's political career for over 20 years, wrote in 2019 that, "For as long as I have known Tulsi Gabbard, I now understand I have never known her and probably never will. So much of what she does seems to make sense only to her."

Last month, a remarkable story from Washington Post reporter Jon Swaine brought us one step closer to understanding the enigma that is Tulsi Gabbard. His investigation helps explain why, for instance, Gabbard has shape-shifted over the years from liberal Democrat to Bernie Sanders ally to Trump insider, why she's flip-flopped on same-sex marriage and war with Iran. As Swaine uncovered, Gabbard's public persona may have been shaped and reshaped in part by a mysterious guru and his followers. Jon, welcome to the show.

Jon Swaine: Thanks for having me.

Micah Loewinger: Tell us about how you got interested in this wild story.

Jon Swaine: I'd always been interested in Tulsi Gabbard because she has been such an unusual political figure. She's gone from being a socially conservative Democrat to a liberal Democrat and a Bernie Sanders ally to eventually being a MAGA Republican and Donald Trump appointee. I'd been interested in some stories over the years in magazines like The New Yorker and New York Magazine and in some Hawaii publications about this faith group that she grew up in, the Science of Identity Foundation.

None of them had really gotten to the bottom of whether it mattered and whether Chris Butler, the founder, had any influence on her politics. She had always said he was her spiritual teacher, her guru, but there just seemed to be this lingering question of what exactly was their relationship. When she was nominated by Trump to be Director of National Intelligence, I thought I'd give it a go.

Micah Loewinger: To be clear, Tulsi Gabbard has definitively rejected any claims that Chris Butler has had any influence on her politics. She had this exchange with one of your Washington Post colleagues back in 2019.

Reporter: For clarity purposes, Chris Butler, how would you describe--

Tulsi Gabbard: He's one of my spiritual teachers.

Reporter: What does that mean?

Tulsi Gabbard: One who provides spiritual guidance.

Reporter: Has he been a mentor politically, or is it just spiritually?

Tulsi Gabbard: No, no, not at all.

Micah Loewinger: Talk about the Science of Identity Foundation and Chris Butler. What are their beliefs?

Jon Swaine: Chris Butler, in the late '60s, dropped out of the University of Hawaii and fell in with the Hare Krishna movement, which was just then beginning. He quickly accumulated a group of followers, devotees. He was charismatic and good-looking and a good speaker. That grew into this organization that he called the Science of Identity Foundation. Spiritually, it is a sort of offshoot of the Hare Krishna movement, and it's interested in chanting and yoga and diet and morals.

Chris Butler: What is your essence? You are the life force, the spirit soul, only temporarily in the body, using the body. "Aham Brahmasmi, I am Brahman, I am spirit, I am not matter."

Jon Swaine: Chris Butler himself has a really unusual politics. It doesn't really fit on the left-right spectrum. He's very much into environmentalism and anti-capitalism, but he's against abortion and against same-sex marriage and homosexuality.

Lectures that Chris Butler gave to his followers in the '80s and '90s that I saw were very anti-gay people, very anti-Muslims. Former members I actually spoke with recalled that when they went to schools associated with the Science of Identity Foundation, they would be expected to listen to recordings of Chris Butler's lectures. Several of them actually noted their surprise as they thought back about how explicit and disgusted Chris Butler's lectures were when talking about gay people.

Chris Butler: Because they have no logic in their explanations that it's somehow normal, or that it's clean, or that it's not sinful, that a man is having sex with a man or a woman with a woman, they must convert us by force.

Jon Swaine: He also has, from reading his lectures, quite wild conspiratorial views on other things, including sometimes the intelligence services and intelligence agencies. That was the kind of environment and the kind of teachings that were going on in this group when Tulsi Gabbard's parents became members in the early '80s.

Micah Loewinger: He has these sort of idiosyncratic beliefs, but why then do some former members say that he is a cult leader?

Jon Swaine: Former members say that, actually, behind the scenes, there's a more troubling side to the organization, and that is that Chris Butler demands complete obedience from his devotees. He demands complete secrecy. They have to serve him and work for free in his kitchens and provide him with all sorts of things, and that he controls major life decisions, that he tells people who they should marry and when and things like that. This is very much not what's publicly stated by the organization, and they definitely dispute characterizations of a cult.

Micah Loewinger: Some former members reportedly said that they would die for him?

Jon Swaine: Right back at the start of his guru-ship, there were reports in the Hawaii press about that kind of thing. Yes, indeed, a couple of devotees said they would do anything for him, and a reporter said, "Even kill yourselves?" They said, "Yes."

Micah Loewinger: The main source in your piece is a woman named Rebecca Saltzburg. You first spoke to her back in 2024. She was a member of the Science of Identity Foundation and worked on several of Tulsi Gabbard's congressional campaigns. When you first spoke to her, Saltzburg told you that Gabbard's ideas and political path were 100% her own and that they were not shaped at all by her guru, Chris Butler. Then nine months later, Saltzburg got back in touch with you, and her story had changed. What did she say?

Jon Swaine: She said that she hadn't really told me the full story last time, and that things were more complicated, that she had fallen out badly with Science of Identity Foundation over quite separate issues of the way they handled allegations of abuse within the organization. I think that and her disenchantment with Tulsi Gabbard moving far to the right politically had led her to come forward and correct the record, to correct what she'd told me before, and that was that Chris Butler was involved, according to Rebecca.

We messaged for a couple of weeks, and something that I asked her prompted her to check an old email account. In that email account, she found dozens of documents containing guidance for Tulsi Gabbard when she was in Congress. According to Rebecca, these documented the guidance and the directives that Chris Butler gave Gabbard.

Micah Loewinger: The question you asked her was, "Do you know what Nine Isles is?" What is Nine Isles, and what did this lead unlock for you?

Jon Swaine: That's right. About nine months earlier, deep within a company document that was related to someone I thought was in the Science of Identity Foundation and connected to Gabbard was an email address, and it was @nineisles.com. When I asked Rebecca, she said, "Yes, that's the email domain used by Chris Butler's office to send out these political memos." She said, "In fact, I got lots of emails from Nine Isles addresses when I was working for Tulsi Gabbard and when I was working on projects for Chris Butler."

I obviously asked, "Do you still have them?" She thought she had deleted most of them. She said she wanted to be rid of that period of her life. Also, as we've all experienced, needed to clear some space in her inbox, but she, fortunately, did have some still in there.

Micah Loewinger: You gain access to this massive trove of emails. What did you find exactly?

Jon Swaine: These documents were quite strange. They were, first of all, encrypted, so they had to be decrypted, and Rebecca gave me the key that was needed to do that. They were emailed from this anonymous address with pretty much no comment attached to them, and they were unattributed in the document themselves. There was no titles saying who was talking. They were essentially transcripts, it seemed, of someone talking, sometimes talking to Tulsi Gabbard, sometimes saying things that Tulsi Gabbard should do.

It was clear that it was Tulsi Gabbard who was on the receiving end, because often, there would be references to TG and to things that made it clear that it was her, speeches she was planning to give or committees she was on. The speaker giving those directives, and sometimes giving very harsh criticism, was unnamed. When I asked Rebecca who is the speaker, she was amused that I would even ask and said, "It's Chris Butler, obviously. He is the only one who could have talked to Tulsi Gabbard that way. He's the only one who tells any of them what to do."

Micah Loewinger: If it was, in fact, Chris Butler, and you make a pretty compelling case in the piece that it was him, why wouldn't he use his name? It's his organization. He's calling the shots. Why the internal anonymity?

Jon Swaine: The answer to that question appears in the documents themselves sometimes. It comes across very clearly that he and Tulsi Gabbard are aware of how it might look if she was known to be the disciple of this eccentric guru, as he put it in one document, "Everything I've taught, all my lectures, everything will be put on you." According to Rebecca, that's one of the reasons why he wanted complete secrecy around this, why there was no attribution, in case these documents ever did become public, so that they could basically be deniable.

Micah Loewinger: These documents, they span the years of 2011 to 2018, during which Tulsi served her first two terms in Congress. After getting this trove of documents, you began the arduous process of trying to figure out how the advice Tulsi Gabbard was receiving from this advisor may have affected her behavior while she was in office. Can you give some examples of moments when you found Gabbard appearing to do exactly what she had been told to do?

Jon Swaine: I found a memo from 2014 in which this speaker was telling her that the US needed to essentially punish countries whose citizens had been going out to the Middle East and fighting for Islamic State. Your listeners will probably remember that was an issue at the time. The speaker thought that countries such as that should lose the benefits that the State Department gives them in terms of visitors to the US not needing visas.

He said that Tulsi Gabbard should propose this, and the speaker says, "Get it started in the morning. You need to be the leader in this regard. Don't dick around." What I found when I compared the date of that to what Tulsi Gabbard was doing around that time was that she indeed released a statement the following day calling for this policy. A week after that, she introduced a bill in the House of Representatives to do it.

Micah Loewinger: You have also written about Gabbard's proposal to improve medical care for veterans, which appeared to align with another directive that she got from this anonymous advisor.

Jon Swaine: That's right. Also in 2014, there was a crisis in veterans' healthcare. There were backlogs, and veterans were not getting care as quickly as they should have been. This unnamed speaker, this advisor to Tulsi Gabbard, was saying that she needed to propose a new policy that meant veterans could get care anywhere and be reimbursed by the government, and they shouldn't have to get approval first. They could just go in, get treated, and get reimbursed. The speaker tells Tulsi, "Actually, put forward legislation, get it done."

In the following weeks, Tulsi Gabbard wrote an op-ed in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser calling for this policy, but she actually omitted this detail, that preapproval shouldn't be necessary. I got hold of an email in which Chris Butler's top aide said, "He was pissed she didn't say that they should get private care without preapproval." Then a month later, Tulsi Gabbard introduces a bill in the House that does include that detail.

Micah Loewinger: That's yet more evidence that the unnamed person in the transcript was likely Chris Butler. In a memo from October 2015 labeled "CNN Wolf Blitzer Talking Points Final," she received advice on how to respond to the fact that she had been asked by Democratic leadership not to attend a presidential debate. The advisor in that transcript said, "It's not a boo-hoo, I don't get to go to the party situation, Wolf." That's the line being delivered to her. Here's what Tulsi said during the interview she ended up having with Wolf Blitzer.

Tulsi Gabbard: Really, Wolf, that's really the issue here. The issue here is not about me saying, "Boo-hoo, I'm going to miss the party."

Jon Swaine: My colleague Aaron Schaffer and I painstakingly went through 32 of these documents that were specifically marked as talking points for interviews that Tulsi Gabbard was due to give. We went through the videos and the transcripts and found that 24 times, she used phrases from these documents almost verbatim, and the other 8 times, she used ideas from them, if not the actual phrases themselves.

Throughout this trove of documents, there's a real concern and preoccupation with how she appears on TV, whether she's smiling, whether she's doing a strange tic with her eyes that the advisor gets angry about. All of that really seems to be part of a plan to raise her national profile and have her run for president one day.

Micah Loewinger: You note in the piece that the advisor describes her as chickenshit or mealy-mouthed. What was going through your mind as you're seeing this behind-the-scenes shaping of a public official?

Jon Swaine: I think what struck me was that this seemed to be a very unusual advisor-politician relationship. Politicians obviously have advisors, they have informal people that they trust to give them tips and talking points, but I had never known of a public official, like a member of Congress, being dressed down in this way and insulted and spoken to quite demeaningly, like someone was basically in charge of them.

As you said, she's insulted for things she's said in statements, for appearances she's made on TV. It's suggested to her that she apologized to cable news anchors for having been bad on their shows, and even sometimes for allowing criticism from commenters to stay unanswered on her Facebook page. She's yelled at, if you like, by this advisor.

Micah Loewinger: You went through an incredible amount of work trying to verify this claim that you got from your source, Rebecca Saltzburg, that that unnamed advisor or advisors was, in fact, Chris Butler. How did you investigate that claim?

Jon Swaine: From the start, I noticed that in some of these documents, even though they were unattributed, occasionally, the speaker would give a little clue as to who they were, saying, for example, "I'm your guru, and you're my disciple." Tulsi Gabbard was on record saying Chris Butler was her spiritual guru. The 19 documents in all, out of hundreds, where the speaker did self-identify, it always seemed to point to Chris Butler.

The group itself, in their comment to us, claimed that it was other people, that it was Tulsi Gabbard's father in some cases, that it was a man named Sunil Khemaney in others. He's been known as Butler's right-hand man and was known to have advised Tulsi Gabbard, so his involvement would have been less controversial. Every time I found a clue or a self-identification, it pointed to Butler and not to those two men.

I tried other things as well. I used artificial intelligence at one point to just analyze these documents just to see what it could find using statistical models to analyze the words that were used. The verdict really was that this was probably only one speaker, not several, and that it was much more likely to be Chris Butler than those other two men. I had a 7,000-page archive of Chris Butler's known statements and public lectures to compare with these comments and found several similarities. There was a non-word, a sort of misused word, "duplistic" instead of "duplicitous," that appeared both in one of the memos to Tulsi Gabbard and in nine of Chris Butler's own lectures.

Micah Loewinger: As you say, there were other circumstantial clues, like policy advice, where the speaker starts reminiscing about their experience of being a teenager working in Hawaii, which also points to Chris Butler.

Jon Swaine: That's right. Chris Butler was raised in Hawaii and has spoken of his youth in Hawaii. The two other men that the group pointed to, Mike Gabbard, Tulsi's father, he's actually Samoan, and Sunil Khemaney was raised in Hong Kong for the most part. These things and other circumstantial clues just reinforced Rebecca's claim that it was Butler and not anyone else.

Micah Loewinger: Syria was another subject that came up in many of the memos that you got ahold of. This was during the Syrian Civil War, when the Bashar al-Assad regime tried to brutally crush a popular uprising, leading to a 14-year conflict. The person behind those memos said, "The CIA is the one that started this thing." You found it striking that such deep suspicion of US intelligence appeared to have been fed to someone who would later coordinate the nation's top intelligence agencies, including the CIA. Tell me about Chris Butler's stance on Syria and Assad, and how that may have influenced Gabbard's positions.

Jon Swaine: Chris Butler, throughout his lectures, is unmistakably anti-US intervention overseas. He was the son of a radical left-wing physician. When he was a child, his father was a prominent anti-Vietnam War activist and was known for his politics. Butler suspected that his home, when he was growing up, was bugged. He said that the CIA and other agencies were trying to control people with mind control, and that they were also trying to infiltrate the Hare Krishna movement.

Chris Butler thought that the agitation for a war with Iran was wrong, and that US intervention in Syria during that civil war was wrong as well. We see in these memos a steady stream of advice, often very forceful, to Tulsi Gabbard to oppose US intervention overseas. Tulsi Gabbard is known for having carved out that policy position herself when she was in Congress. It was one of her biggest, you might say, signature stances that the US intervention in Syria was wrong, and that the US should stop interfering overseas.

Micah Loewinger: In the memos, the advisor is saying things like, "The CIA is the one that started this war in Syria," which is a more extreme position and theory than what we see from Tulsi Gabbard.

Jon Swaine: It's interesting. This is an example of where, for several years, Tulsi Gabbard seems to be a bit more restrained than the advice that she was receiving. She, at that time, and in the following months and years, would say that the CIA had been wrong to arm Syrian rebels and to interfere and to get involved and to make this situation worse. I found that, actually, toward the end of her time in Congress, in 2019, when she was running for president, she did go just about as far as that slightly wild claim from the advisor. She was on Stephen Colbert's show in 2019, and basically said that, "Yes, back in 2011, the CIA had begun this," what she called, "regime change war."

Tulsi Gabbard (archival): There are two things we need to address in Syria. One is a regime change war that was first launched by the United States in 2011, covertly led by the CIA.

Jon Swaine: It's a pretty left-field statement, given that it was a civil war that everyone knows the US did then intervene to prop up some people in it, but to claim that the CIA actually started it is something else.

Micah Loewinger: You also found in that trove of documents a literal directive to tweet from Gabbard's account about the plight of Kurdish fighters in Kobane. Shortly after Gabbard appears to receive this directive, she posts that tweet verbatim.

Jon Swaine: That's right. This was actually an unusual example, in that it was sent directly and unencrypted to Tulsi Gabbard's personal email account. She gets an email from a woman that we understand to have been Chris Butler's top aide, subject in caps, "IMPORTANT TO DO," and then "MUST TWEET AROUND 9:00 AM." It had language that the aide said was approved, and Tulsi Gabbard's account posts it verbatim.

Another email says that she should send follow-up tweets that tag senior administration officials because "he'd like them to see the video." He is not mentioned, as usual. When this advisor is being discussed by his circle, it's always "he" or sometimes "our friend" or "S," which we know to be a nickname within the organization for Chris Butler. Sure enough, Tulsi Gabbard did go ahead and send follow-up tweets tagging senior people in the administration with this video of victims in Syria.

Micah Loewinger: I understand that Tulsi Gabbard has denied that Chris Butler played this advisor role in her life. He's done the same. Did you uncover any clues as to why Tulsi Gabbard would want to go along with this kind of behavior? Aren't politicians kind of egotistical? Don't many of them have a kind of "I always know right" attitude about their behavior? Why would a public official want to be directed and pushed around like this?

Jon Swaine: I'd love to talk to Tulsi Gabbard about this question. She didn't respond to my questions, and I don't know her mind. Rebecca and others who have experience of Chris Butler point out that when they are initiated by Butler as his disciples, they essentially pledge allegiance to him and obedience to him, and that they will follow what he says. Again, this is something that the Science of Identity Foundation disputes.

They say that's not how the guru relationship actually works, and people are free to make their own minds up, but that's certainly the explanation I get from Rebecca and former members, that in all aspects of their life, they ultimately had to answer to Chris Butler and do what he said. Tulsi Gabbard, in her job, it just happened to be that she was a politician, and she knew to do what he told her to do.

Micah Loewinger: You note that in the memos that you received, the unnamed speaker was very interested in Donald Trump's candidacy in 2016, and that person believed that Trump, albeit imperfectly, was kind of occupying Tulsi Gabbard's potential lane.

Jon Swaine: Chris Butler, in his lectures and public remarks, has been critical of Islam and has shown himself to be pretty hostile to Muslims. When Donald Trump ran for president in 2016, this was after the massacre in an Orlando nightclub, he gave what was a high-profile speech about the risk of immigration of what he called "Islamic extremists."

Donald Trump: If we want to protect the quality of life for all Americans, women and children, gay and straight, Jews and Christians, and all people, then we need to tell the truth about radical Islam, and we need to do it now.

Jon Swaine: This unnamed advisor, who our source says is Chris Butler, sees this speech and tells Tulsi Gabbard, "This is annoying because this is right up your alley." He told her, "It's too bad you're not running. It's all falling into place, but for the wrong guy. Now Trump is going to be the one, and he's a total idiot." There's this frustration that Donald Trump might be tapping into this sort of populist, not politically correct stance that this advisor hoped that Tulsi would be the one to take to the national stage.

Micah Loewinger: The advisor basically says, "This could have been you."

Jon Swaine: That's right. This unnamed advisor also takes a keen interest in people around Trump and who's influencing him, people that are now more familiar than they were at the time, like Stephen Miller and Michael Flynn. He, in memos even before Donald Trump was running for president, said that the government needed to think "America first," which, we all know now, is something that Donald Trump has pushed very hard on.

In another memo about the crime problem in some inner cities, this advisor called for occupying them with the National Guard, which Donald Trump obviously did more recently. This advisor, I should say, one thing that comes through in the memos is that they're a keen viewer of Fox News, and we know that is also true of Donald Trump. There's definitely overlap in the politics of this advisor, who may be Chris Butler, and Trump. It does help make sense, I think, of why Tulsi Gabbard made this shift from Democrat to MAGA Republican.

Micah Loewinger: On May 22nd, Fox News reported that Tulsi Gabbard would be stepping down from her role as Director of National Intelligence. The timing was a little suspect, given that two days earlier, you had emailed her, her press secretary, and her chief of staff, saying that you were moving ahead with this story and asking her for comment on a number of questions. Do you think that your story had been anything to do with her resignation?

Jon Swaine: I really don't know beyond the timing coincidence that you mentioned. There had been lots of rumors and reports that she might be on the way out. She had this opposition to war with Iran going back years, and Donald Trump took the US to war with Iran. She had been publicly slapped down by Trump on other things. When she did announce that she was going, she said that sadly her husband had been diagnosed with cancer and she needed to support him. It's interesting that the timing lined up like that. I honestly don't know, and I would love to know. We would have really liked to have interviewed her, but she declined.

Micah Loewinger: There are two questions that you ask yourself in this piece. Had a reclusive guru been secretly trying to steer Tulsi Gabbard's actions as a public official? Could that shed light on the improbable arc traced by one of the most unconventional, enigmatic shapeshifters in modern American politics? What answers did you come to by the end of your reporting?

Jon Swaine: I think on the first, we present a large amount of evidence pointing to Chris Butler being the unnamed advisor. We can't say decisively because the group denies it and the memos are unattributed. On the second, I am more confident in being able to say that I think whoever this person was advising, whether it was Chris Butler or his right-hand man, the eccentric politics, the shifting positions, the unusual stances on various different things that this advice contained, does match Tulsi Gabbard's own shape-shifting in many ways. I think it does help us understand why she was such an unusual member of Congress and DNI and might continue to be if she returns to politics after this.

Micah Loewinger: Tulsi Gabbard came to align herself with a political movement that alleged that the people in Washington were not who they say they are, that they were not acting transparently for the American people, and that webs of conflicts of interest had rendered the political status quo rotten. Is it not ironic that Tulsi Gabbard would potentially be influenced by shadowy forces herself?

Jon Swaine: I think you could see an irony there, but the thing is, the memos show that this unnamed advisor, possibly Chris Butler, and apparently Tulsi Gabbard herself, believed that, indeed, people in Washington, the establishment in Washington, was captured by corporate interests and military-industrial interests, and that she was a true, what they call, servant leader, serving the people and being an independent thinker. I think it's clear that these memos definitely raise questions about how much of an independent thinker she really was, because she seems to have been given scripts and policies to propose and things to do and things to say, and she seems to have done them.

Micah Loewinger: A lot of politicians have been accused of having someone behind the scenes influence them, like spouses or senior advisors or religious leaders. I'm thinking of the role that Nancy Reagan was said to have played during Reagan's presidency, or Vice President Dick Cheney during George W. Bush's presidency, or concerns that John F. Kennedy would listen to the Pope over the American people because he was Catholic. This fear or suspicion that someone unelected is pulling the strings is not in and of itself new or unique to Tulsi Gabbard. Why is this story, in your mind, different? Why did you feel it was so important to spend years working on it?

Jon Swaine: I think those examples you give, they all have different factors that make them different from this story. Dick Cheney was the duly elected vice president of the country. I think everyone expects presidential spouses to be giving the president private counsel at times. The difference here is that Tulsi Gabbard explicitly denied that this person was influencing her politics because there was concern. If he is or if he was, that contradicts what she said publicly.

I think the fact that these allegations by former members of his group have been made about how he treats people, how he expects people to give him complete obedience and secrecy, and to protect the fact of his influence from public view, that made me determined to find whether he really was influencing her, and whether this was a secret that she was keeping from people. Her elevation to Director of National Intelligence, overseeing some of the most powerful agencies in the government, I think, made that question even more important.

Micah Loewinger: Obviously, there's a lot we don't know about Gabbard's relationship with Chris Butler, especially during her time as Director of National Intelligence. Are there any other big questions you'd still like answered?

Jon Swaine: I think the big question I would like answered by Tulsi Gabbard and by Chris Butler's group, the Science of Identity Foundation, is: having now read our piece, presumably, and having now seen the weight of evidence that we present, is it still their position that Chris Butler didn't advise Tulsi Gabbard on politics, and in fact, that these memos were from other people, or do they want to correct anything that they said to us?

[music]

Micah Loewinger: I really hope you one day score an interview with him or get closer to answering that question because this was just such tremendous and enthralling reporting. Jon, thanks so much for coming on the show.

Jon Swaine: Thanks for having me.

Micah Loewinger: Jon Swaine is an investigative reporter at The Washington Post. His latest piece is titled Tulsi Gabbard, her guru and the mysterious messages that helped shape her political career. Thanks for listening to the Midweek Podcast. Be sure to listen to the big show on Friday, but in the meantime, you should check us out on Instagram and TikTok. Just search On the Media. I'm Micah Loewinger.

 

Copyright © 2026 New York Public Radio. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use at www.wnyc.org for further information.

New York Public Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline, often by contractors. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of New York Public Radio’s programming is the audio record.