Vaccine Hesitation & Misinformation
Brian Lehrer: Brian Lehrer on WNYC. Yes, on Tuesdays on the show, we like to bring the science on health and climate, and sometimes other science policy issues. Today, we return to the issue of vaccines with one of America's leading vaccine scientists. As the vaccine news continues to pile up, even as the public is mostly being focused on the war, we don't want to get distracted from everything else as we speak. In the first two months of this year alone, the US reported 1,100 cases of measles, six times more than has been typical for an entire year since measles was declared eliminated in this country.
This outbreak unfolds against a backdrop of sweeping changes, as you know, to how the federal government talks about, recommends, and regulates vaccines. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices was overhauled. The childhood vaccine schedule has been cut, and the chair of that committee under RFK has even suggested that the polio vaccine should be optional.
Earlier this month, the FDA also reversed course on reviewing a new flu vaccine that trials showed was significantly more effective than what we currently have. They then, under public pressure, reverse themselves again, and now they will at least review it. Some breaking news is that the Trump administration has apparently convinced an international panel to wait until after the midterm elections to declare if the US loses its measles elimination status.
With me on as much of this as we could get to is Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician in infectious diseases at Children's Hospital in Philadelphia. He's the author of Autism's False Prophets and most recently, Tell Me When It's Over: An Insider's Guide to Deciphering COVID Myths and Navigating Our Post-Pandemic World. He's also one of those ACIP, Vaccine Advisory board members who was fired last spring. Dr. Offit, always good to have you. Welcome back to WNYC.
Dr. Paul Offit: Hi, Brian. It's my pleasure.
Brian Lehrer: I see you published something just this morning responding to comments that Health Secretary Kennedy made on a podcast this week about germs. You characterized it as the toilet seat challenge test. What? What do you mean by that?
Dr. Paul Offit: Right. On a podcast, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that he's not scared of germs because he has snorted cocaine off toilet seats, which I guess means that he doesn't have to worry about that anymore. If you can get past the fact that our nation's number one public health official said something like that, he has many germs to worry about as a man in his 70s, like respiratory syncytial virus or influenza or pneumococcus, or COVID. All of which can cause someone his age to be hospitalized or worse. He's not immune to germs, even though he was able to snort cocaine off of toilet seats.
Brian Lehrer: This is the worst, most conspiratorial thing that people have said about RFK that I've been slow to believe that he seems to be confirming with this comment that he doesn't believe in germ theory. Meaning that he doesn't believe fundamentally that germs spread from person to person, or in this case, surface to person, and cause disease. Am I over-interpreting this?
Dr. Paul Offit: No. If you read his book, The Real Anthony Fauci, and I don't recommend it, but on pages 285 to 288, he says that. He says that he doesn't believe that specific germs cause specific diseases, which was well established by the late 1800s. Rather, he believes in the miasma theory, that there's generally these poisons out there which you can avoid simply by having good health and making sure you have good nutrition. He'll say that. He'll say things like when children, for example, die of measles, he'll assume that they were immune-compromised, or they were living in a food desert, which wasn't true of the two healthy little girls in West Texas last year who died of a vaccine-preventable disease, measles, because they weren't vaccinated.
Brian Lehrer: Here's that breaking measles news. An international panel was set to meet in April, I see, to decide whether the US officially loses its measles elimination status. That meeting has now been pushed to November after the midterm elections. I see that that's at the request of US health officials. They say they need more time to analyze the data. Do you believe the rationale? What would it mean except a designation on paper for the US to lose its measles elimination status?
Dr. Paul Offit: You're right. That's all it means, which is a designation on paper. The fact is, this is a measles-endemic country now. Last year, 2025, we had more measles cases than we've had in more than 30 years. We had three people die of measles, which equals the total number of measles deaths in this country over the last 25 years. We had our first measles death in a child since 2003. That's more than 20 years ago.
I think you can assume that if you're coming to this country, you better make sure that you're immunized against measles because measles is circulating here.
Brian Lehrer: Last June, Kennedy fired all 17 members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This is maybe a little wonky and bureaucratic for a lot of listeners. They don't know what ACIP is, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, ACIP. Full disclosure, you were included among those who were canned. Then, earlier this year, the committee cut the childhood vaccine schedule from 17 diseases to 11. That included a vaccine that you co-invented, the rotavirus vaccine, and that's no longer universally recommended by them for infants under the new schedule, along with Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, RSV, HPV, and the meningococcal immunization. Maybe there's some point of personal pride that's been damaged here for you, but what does it mean to you personally, and what do you think it means medically that those vaccines are not being universally recommended anymore?
Dr. Paul Offit: Just for the record, I was on the ACIP between 1998 and 2003. I was on the FDA-
Brian Lehrer: Oh, you were not currently on it. Sorry. Let me correct that. I apologize.
Dr. Paul Offit: I wasn't one of those. I was on the FDA Vaccine Advisory Committee from 2017 to 2025, and they asked me to be on for another four years. I said sure, but I think RFK Jr blocked that. That's maybe where you're confused. In any case, you're right. What he's done is he's doing what he's been doing for the last 20 years. For the last 20 years, he's been an anti-vaccine activist and science denialist who's flooded the social media with misinformation. Now he's in a position where he can make public policy and do far more harm. That's what he's doing.
He wants to make vaccines less available, less affordable, and more feared. His first step is this one, which is aside from firing all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, which generally gives advice and then replaces them with people like him who have an anti vaccine bias, he's taken vaccines like the influenza vaccine or the COVID vaccine or the rotavirus vaccine and made them basically optional, so called shared clinical decision making, which means you can reasonably make a decision not to get any of those vaccines, which would not be a good decision.
What's true about all three of those viruses, flu, COVID, and rotavirus, is that all of them are short incubation period, so-called mucosal infections, meaning if everybody in the world were vaccinated, you would still see those viruses circulating. The goal of that vaccine is to keep you out of the hospital, keep you out of the intensive care unit, and keep you out of the morgue by choosing not to get that vaccine. That's a very real choice to perhaps suffer those infections because those viruses continue to circulate.
Brian Lehrer: They're all over the place on the measles vaccine. The CDC's new acting director, a Kennedy ally, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, publicly endorsed the measles vaccine. Dr. Bhattacharya also, however, co-authored the memo that cut the childhood vaccine schedule from 17 to 11, but they didn't take measles out of that universally recommended. At the same time, at her confirmation hearing last week, Casey Means, the Surgeon General nominee, wouldn't say that mothers should vaccinate their kids against measles.
One of the chapters in her best-selling book is titled Trust Yourself, Not Your Doctor. That being said, she has repeatedly debunked the myth that childhood vaccines lead to autism. Taking all of these things together, they're all over the place. What do you make of it?
Dr. Paul Offit: It's a mess. You have basically the first child died of measles in this country in more than 20 years, last February. Since then, no one has really stood up and said, "Get a measles vaccine. Vaccinate your children. This death was unconscionable. This unvaccinated child's death was preventable and therefore unconscionable." No one. You had your nation's number one public health official, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., not doing that. You have Casey Means, who was up for the possible position of United States Surgeon General, who was unwilling to clearly say that children should get a measles vaccine.
Finally, Jay Bhattacharya, in a two-minute public health announcement on X, said that it is important to get a measles vaccine, for which he was universally adored by people at the CDC. There was an article in The New York Times saying that this was a great thing. That's how low the bar has sunk. We have more than 3,000 cases of measles in this country, and finally, a public health official said something on behalf of public health instead of just, "Talk to your doctor."
Brian Lehrer: The germs thing is still blowing my mind. Do you think that that underlies Kennedy's skepticism about vaccines?
Dr. Paul Offit: He has said many times that he believes that vaccines have merely a lessened infectious disease at the cost of causing chronic diseases. His war against vaccines, which is successful-- Look at the cases of influenza and measles and tetanus, and whooping cough last year, have taken off because of his anti-vaccine advocacy. He thinks he's doing good. He thinks that although these diseases are coming back, that's okay because he believes he's lowering chronic diseases, even though there's no evidence for any of that. He's that far gone.
Brian Lehrer: Let me ask you to do one science favor before you go, and that is explain from your point of view the controversy over mRNA vaccines. In particular, RFK Jr has called the mRNA COVID vaccine "the deadliest vaccine in history," the various ones, because the big ones were all mRNA. The news related to this is that the FDA rejected Moderna's application to review a new mRNA flu vaccine. Then they did reverse course, as I said in the intro two weeks later, after an uproar from the pharmaceutical industry, among others, meaning they're at least looking at it now to make a determination. Why mRNA? Remind people what it stands for. Remind people what the theory is that leads people like Kennedy to think that they're more dangerous than other vaccines. Your take as a vaccine scientist.
Dr. Paul Offit: mRNA stands for messenger RNA. In each cell of our body, or most cells in our body, we have about 200,000 separate pieces of mRNA, which make the proteins and enzymes necessary for life. The mRNA vaccines makes specifically a protein on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 virus, the cause of COVID. It was a highly effective and safe vaccine. That vaccine has probably saved 3 million lives in this country and 20 million lives worldwide for a very small cost. It was a rare cause of myocarditis, which means inflammation of the heart muscle, but that inflammation was generally short-lived, temporary, and self-resolving.
Considering this vaccine has been given to more than a billion people, it has worked extremely well. Why is it the target, then, of people like Robert F. Kennedy Jr? I think the answer is the first two years of the pandemic. In 2020, we didn't have anything. We closed businesses, restricted travel, closed, shuttered schools. I think that was seen as massive government overreach. Then the second year, 2021, when we had a vaccine. People couldn't go anywhere without their vaccine card, couldn't go to their favorite bar or restaurant or sporting event or wedding, and they may be fired from their jobs.
That, I think, created this libertarian backlash, and that we've leaned into that left hook. I think mRNA vaccines have probably suffered the most. There's nothing specifically about the vaccine that should be worrisome. It's tremendously safe and effective. That mRNA flu vaccine certainly looked great. Finally, after two weeks, the FDA caved and agreed to honor something they had committed to in written form months earlier. I don't know. I think it's political. It's a political vaccine, which is unfortunate.
Brian Lehrer: There's no current mRNA flu vaccine that's been approved anywhere in the world, is my understanding. If this one gets through, let's say it does get approved, what does it open up? We have 30 seconds.
Dr. Paul Offit: If you look at the data, it looks like it's 27% more effective at preventing flu symptoms. It looks like it's about 49% effective at preventing flu hospitalizations. This looks like a tremendous advance. Hopefully, that vaccine will be available August and September of this year for use, because the data certainly look good.
Brian Lehrer: There we leave it with Dr. Paul Offit from Children's Hospital in Philadelphia, author of books, including his latest, Tell Me When It's Over: An Insider's Guide to Deciphering COVID Myths and Navigating Our Post-Pandemic world. Thank you for coming on with us again. We always learn when you're here.
Dr. Paul Offit: Thank you, Brian.
[00:15:07] [END OF AUDIO]
Copyright © 2026 New York Public Radio. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use at www.wnyc.org for further information.
New York Public Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline, often by contractors. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of New York Public Radio’s programming is the audio record.
